[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y18scqmp.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 15:03:42 +0200
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>
To: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
<palmer@...belt.com>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, Nathan
Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>, Nick
Terrell <terrelln@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] riscv: make image compression configurable
Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com> writes:
> Masahiro's patch[1] made me wonder why we're not just using KBUILD_IMAGE
> to determine which (possibly compressed) kernel image to use in 'make
> tar-pkg' like other architectures do. It turns out we're always setting
> KBUILD_IMAGE to the uncompressed Image file and then compressing it into
> the Image.gz file afterwards.
>
> This series fixes that so the compression method is configurable and
> KBUILD_IMAGE is set to the chosen (possibly uncompressed) kernel image
> which is then used by targets like 'make install' and 'make bindeb-pkg' and
> 'make tar-pkg'.
>
> Patch 3/3 depends on the previously mentioned patch below.
Nice!
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists