[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ee278102-f4b8-4ca0-879e-f83cd54efbd0@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 17:57:55 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] dt-bindings: clock: mobileye,eyeq5-clk: drop
bindings
On 03/05/2024 16:20, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> Switch from sub-nodes in system-controller for each functionality to a
> single node representing the entire OLB instance. dt-bindings is
> unnecessary and soc/mobileye/mobileye,eyeq5-olb.yaml will inherit all
> properties.
Why changing this? You just added these bindings not so long time ago...
This is very confusing to push bindings and then immediately ask to
remove them.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists