[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240506213150.13608-1-ppbuk5246@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 22:31:50 +0100
From: Levi Yun <ppbuk5246@...il.com>
To: anna-maria@...utronix.de,
frederic@...nel.org,
mingo@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Levi Yun <ppbuk5246@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] time/tick-sched: enable idle load balancing when nohz_full cpu becomes idle.
When nohz_full CPU stops tick in tick_nohz_irq_exit(),
It wouldn't be chosen to perform idle load balancing bacause it doesn't
call nohz_balance_enter_idle() in tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick() when it
becomes idle.
tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick() is only called in idle state and
nohz_balance_enter_idle() tracks the CPU is part of nohz.idle_cpus_mask
with rq->nohz_tick_stopped.
So, nohz_balance_enter_idle() could be called safely without !was_stooped
check.
Signed-off-by: Levi Yun <ppbuk5246@...il.com>
---
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 71a792cd8936..31a4cd89782f 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -1228,8 +1228,10 @@ void tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick(void)
ts->idle_sleeps++;
ts->idle_expires = expires;
- if (!was_stopped && tick_sched_flag_test(ts, TS_FLAG_STOPPED)) {
- ts->idle_jiffies = ts->last_jiffies;
+ if (tick_sched_flag_test(ts, TS_FLAG_STOPPED)) {
+ if (!was_stopped)
+ ts->idle_jiffies = ts->last_jiffies;
+
nohz_balance_enter_idle(cpu);
}
} else {
--
2.41.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists