[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZjigFRyMhgcS6Zju@ashyti-mobl2.lan>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 11:17:09 +0200
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
Cc: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@...il.com>,
"open list:INTEL DRM DISPLAY FOR XE AND I915 DRIVERS" <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:INTEL DRM DISPLAY FOR XE AND I915 DRIVERS" <intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:INTEL GVT-g DRIVERS (Intel GPU Virtualization)" <intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
"open list:RADEON and AMDGPU DRM DRIVERS" <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS" <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:I2C SUBSYSTEM HOST DRIVERS" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:BTTV VIDEO4LINUX DRIVER" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:FRAMEBUFFER LAYER" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Zhi Wang <zhiwang@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] drm/i915: Make I2C terminology more inclusive
Hi,
On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 03:34:12PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 06:13:24PM +0000, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> > I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave"
> > with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
> > series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of
> > I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that the approved verbiage exists
> > in the specification.
> >
> > Compile tested, no functionality changes intended
> >
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240322132619.6389-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com/
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
> > Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
>
> It looks like the ack is not needed since we are merging this through
> drm-intel-next. But I'm planing to merge this only after seeing the
> main drivers/i2c accepting the new terminology. So we don't have a
> risk of that getting push back and new names there and we having
> to rename it once again.
I basically agree with this patch (without the eDP part).
But the documentation is still not update and I think we need to
hold until Wolfram has done that.
In any case, it's good to anticipate the reviews.
Thanks Easwar,
Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists