[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f301ebb0-adf2-33c9-d548-7738a010ce92@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 20:12:46 +0800
From: "Liao, Chang" <liaochang1@...wei.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
CC: <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>, <maz@...nel.org>,
<oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, <james.morse@....com>, <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
<yuzenghui@...wei.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <ardb@...nel.org>,
<broonie@...nel.org>, <anshuman.khandual@....com>, <miguel.luis@...cle.com>,
<joey.gouly@....com>, <ryan.roberts@....com>, <jeremy.linton@....com>,
<ericchancf@...gle.com>, <kristina.martsenko@....com>, <robh@...nel.org>,
<scott@...amperecomputing.com>, <songshuaishuai@...ylab.org>,
<shijie@...amperecomputing.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<bhe@...hat.com>, <horms@...nel.org>, <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
<rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>, <shahuang@...hat.com>,
<takakura@...inux.co.jp>, <dianders@...omium.org>, <swboyd@...omium.org>,
<sumit.garg@...aro.org>, <frederic@...nel.org>, <reijiw@...gle.com>,
<akihiko.odaki@...nix.com>, <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Rework the DAIF mask, unmask and track API
在 2024/5/4 1:10, Mark Rutland 写道:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 06:47:50AM +0000, Liao Chang wrote:
>> This patch series reworks the DAIF mask, unmask, and track API for the
>> upcoming FEAT_NMI extension added in Armv8.8.
>>
>> As platform and virtualization[1] supports for FEAT_NMI is emerging, and
>> Mark Brown's FEAT_NMI patch series[2] highlighted the need for clean up
>> the existing hacking style approach about DAIF management code before
>> adding NMI functionality, furthermore, we discover some subtle bugs
>> during 'perf' and 'ipi_backtrace' transition from PSEUDO_NMI to
>> FEAT_NMI, in summary, all of these emphasize the importance of rework.
>>
>> This series of reworking patches follows the suggestion from Mark
>> Rutland mentioned in Mark Brown's patchset. In summary, he think the
>> better way for DAIF manangement look likes as following:
>>
>> (a) Adding entry-specific helpers to manipulate abstract exception masks
>> covering DAIF + PMR + ALLINT. Those need unmask-at-entry and
>> mask-at-exit behaviour, and today only need to manage DAIF + PMR.
>>
>> It should be possible to do this ahead of ALLINT / NMI support.
>>
>> (b) Adding new "logical exception mask" helpers that treat DAIF + PMR +
>> ALLINT as separate elements.
>
> I've started looking at this in the series. There are some subtleties here, and
> I don't think the helpers in this series are quite right as-is. I will try to
> get back to you next week with a description of those; it'll take a short while
> to write that up correctly and clearly and I don't trust myself to rush that
> last thing on a Friday.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
Hi,Mark
Thanks for your feedback.I apprecaite your interest in this patch series
and look forward to receiving additional comments from you and others in
the community.
I am pleased to inform you that the FEAT_NMI features has been successfully
merged into the upstream QEMU codebase at the "master" branch recently. This
allow for initial testing without requiring hardware support for FEAT_NMI.
To ensure minimal regressions introduced by this patch series, i have done
testing using perf top, hardlokup and ipi nmi for various configurations,
including (1) no NMI (2) use CONFIG_PSEUDO_NMI (3) use CONFIG_ARM64_NMI.
We encourage further discussion and feedback on the patch series. We are
particularly interested in hearing from developers who might have experience
with NMI handling or those using platforms with FEAT_NMI capabilities.
Thank you.
>
>>
>> This patches cherry-pick a part of Mark Brown' FEAT_NMI series, in order
>> to pass compilation and basic testing, includes perf and ipi_backtrace.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240407081733.3231820-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com/
>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/Y4sH5qX5bK9xfEBp@lpieralisi/
>>
>> v3->v2:
>> 1. Squash two commits that address two minor issues into Mark Brown's
>> origin patch for detecting FEAT_NMI.
>> 2. Add one patch resolves the kprobe reenter panic while testing
>> FEAT_NMI on QEMU.
>>
>> v2->v1:
>> Add SoB tags following the origin author's SoBs.
>>
>> Liao Chang (5):
>> arm64: daifflags: Add logical exception masks covering DAIF + PMR +
>> ALLINT
>> arm64: Unify exception masking at entry and exit of exception
>> arm64: Deprecate old local_daif_{mask,save,restore}
>> irqchip/gic-v3: Improve the maintainability of NMI masking in GIC
>> driver
>> arm64: kprobe: Keep NMI maskabled while kprobe is stepping xol
>>
>> Mark Brown (3):
>> arm64/sysreg: Add definitions for immediate versions of MSR ALLINT
>> arm64/cpufeature: Detect PE support for FEAT_NMI
>> arm64/nmi: Add Kconfig for NMI
>>
>> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 17 ++
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 6 +
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h | 298 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/nmi.h | 27 +++
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 2 +
>> arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 10 +-
>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 58 +++++-
>> arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c | 7 +-
>> arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 96 +++++----
>> arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 2 -
>> arch/arm64/kernel/hibernate.c | 6 +-
>> arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 4 +-
>> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 2 +-
>> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 6 +-
>> arch/arm64/kernel/suspend.c | 6 +-
>> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c | 6 +-
>> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c | 4 +-
>> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 6 +-
>> arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps | 2 +
>> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 6 +-
>> 23 files changed, 442 insertions(+), 134 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/nmi.h
>>
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>>
>
--
BR
Liao, Chang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists