[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZjvEam5paLD0Iv6V@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 21:28:58 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] eeprom: 93xx46: drop unneeded MODULE_ALIAS
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 08:15:00PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 08/05/2024 19:53, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 05:49:57PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> The ID table already has respective entry and MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE and
> >> creates proper alias for SPI driver. Having another MODULE_ALIAS causes
> >> the alias to be duplicated.
..
> >> MODULE_ALIAS("spi:93xx46");
> >
> > I was stumbled over this (leftover?).
> > Commit message doesn't elaborate this bit.
> > Any comments?
>
> It is not present in ID table and commit msg removes only duplicated
> aliases. That alias has meaning - someone might be actually relying on it.
It seems no users for it. The only user of platform data of this EEPROM uses
board files which AFAIU bypasses modalias matching.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists