linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] net: phy: mediatek: Add mtk phy lib for token ring access & LED/other manipulations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 15:02:08 +0100
From: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Sky Huang <SkyLake.Huang@...iatek.com>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Qingfang Deng <dqfext@...il.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
	Steven Liu <Steven.Liu@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] net: phy: mediatek: Add mtk phy lib for token ring
 access & LED/other manipulations

On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 02:09:30PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 02:25:56PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Please trim the email when replying to just what is relevant. If i
> > need to page down lots of time to find a comment it is possible i will
> > skip write passed a comment...
> 
> +1. There are _too_ _many_ people on netdev who just don't bother to do
> this, and it's getting to the point where if people can't be bothered
> to make it easier for me to engage with them, I'm just not going to be
> bothered engaging with them. People need to realise that this is a two-
> way thing, and stop making reviewers have extra work trying to find
> their one or two line comment buried in a few hundred lines of irrevant
> content. I might just send a reply, top posting, stating I can't be
> bothered to read their email.

Sorry about that, note taken. I'll take better care of that in future.