[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21ead53d-773b-ab8c-2d7d-cf4419b9a7ea@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 14:38:01 -0700
From: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
<srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>, <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
<perex@...ex.cz>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <corbet@....net>,
<lgirdwood@...il.com>, <andersson@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
<broonie@...nel.org>, <bgoswami@...cinc.com>, <tiwai@...e.com>,
<bagasdotme@...il.com>, <robh@...nel.org>, <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 22/39] ALSA: usb-audio: Prevent starting of audio
stream if in use
Hi Pierre,
On 5/9/2024 6:01 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
>
> On 5/8/24 18:40, Wesley Cheng wrote:
>> Hi Pierre,
>>
>> On 5/7/2024 2:20 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>>>
>>>> If a PCM device is already in use, the check will return an error to
>>>> userspace notifying that the stream is currently busy. This ensures
>>>> that
>>>> only one path is using the USB substream.
>>>
>>> What was the point of having a "USB Mixer" then?
>>
>> The USB mixer is intended to enable/route the USB offloading path to the
>> audio DSP, and is for controlling the ASoC specific entities. This
>> change is needed to resolve any contention between the USB SND PCM
>> device (non offload path) and the ASoC USB BE DAI (offload path).
>
> Not following, sorry. Is the "USB Mixer" some sort of hardware entity
> related to USB offload or just a pure DAPM processing widget handling
> volume and actual mixing between streams?
>
It controls which Multimedia (ASM) stream can be routed to the USB BE DAI.
> I was trying to get clarity on whether there can be multiple streams
> mixed before going to the USB endpoint. The commit message "only one
> path is using the USB substream" is ambiguous, not sure if you are
> referring to mutual exclusion between offloaded and non-offloaded paths,
> or number of streams when offloaded is supported. Different concepts/levels.
Ideally we shouldn't. Only one ASM stream should be allowed to open the
USB AFE port at a time.
Thanks
Wesley Cheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists