linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv5 bpf-next 6/8] x86/shstk: Add return uprobe support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZjyJsl_u_FmYHrki@krava>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 10:30:42 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
To: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Cc: "mhiramat@...nel.org" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
	"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	"ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
	"andrii@...nel.org" <andrii@...nel.org>,
	"oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>,
	"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	"debug@...osinc.com" <debug@...osinc.com>,
	"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
	"yhs@...com" <yhs@...com>,
	"songliubraving@...com" <songliubraving@...com>,
	"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"john.fastabend@...il.com" <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-man@...r.kernel.org" <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
	"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 bpf-next 6/8] x86/shstk: Add return uprobe support

On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 05:35:54PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-05-07 at 12:53 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> > index 81e6ee95784d..ae6c3458a675 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> > @@ -406,6 +406,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(uretprobe)
> >          * trampoline's ret instruction
> >          */
> >         r11_cx_ax[2] = regs->ip;
> > +
> > +       /* make the shadow stack follow that */
> > +       if (shstk_push_frame(regs->ip))
> > +               goto sigill;
> > +
> >         regs->ip = ip;
> >  
> 
> Per the earlier discussion, this cannot be reached unless uretprobes are in use,
> which cannot happen without something with privileges taking an action. But are
> uretprobes ever used for monitoring applications where security is important? Or
> is it strictly a debug-time thing?

sorry, I don't have that level of detail, but we do have customers
that use uprobes in general or want to use it and complain about
the speed

there are several tools in bcc [1] that use uretprobes in scripts,
like:
  memleak, sslsniff, trace, bashreadline, gethostlatency, argdist,
  funclatency

jirka


[1] https://github.com/iovisor/bcc