linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 6/7] drm/panel: lg-sw43408: add missing error handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 01:25:33 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, 
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, 
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>, 
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, 
	Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@...aro.org>, Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, 
	Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 6/7] drm/panel: lg-sw43408: add missing error handling

On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 02:47:05PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:37 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
> <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Add missing error handling for the mipi_dsi_ functions that actually
> > return error code instead of silently ignoring it.
> >
> > Fixes: 069a6c0e94f9 ("drm: panel: Add LG sw43408 panel driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-lg-sw43408.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Looks right to me. Only slight nit would be that I'd put this as the
> first patch in the series to make it obvious to anyone backporting it
> to older kernels that it doesn't have any dependencies on the earlier
> patches in the series. It's fairly obvious so this isn't a huge deal,
> but still could be nice.

Yes. I wanted to emphasise the _multi stuff rather than this fix. I'll
reorder patches for v2. Maybe I should also rebase the series on top of
patches by Cong Yang. WDYT?

> 
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry