lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 15:28:03 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, 
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, 
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>, 
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, 
	Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@...aro.org>, Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, 
	Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	cong yang <yangcong5@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 6/7] drm/panel: lg-sw43408: add missing error handling

Hi,

On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 3:25 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 02:47:05PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:37 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
> > <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Add missing error handling for the mipi_dsi_ functions that actually
> > > return error code instead of silently ignoring it.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 069a6c0e94f9 ("drm: panel: Add LG sw43408 panel driver")
> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-lg-sw43408.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > >  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > Looks right to me. Only slight nit would be that I'd put this as the
> > first patch in the series to make it obvious to anyone backporting it
> > to older kernels that it doesn't have any dependencies on the earlier
> > patches in the series. It's fairly obvious so this isn't a huge deal,
> > but still could be nice.
>
> Yes. I wanted to emphasise the _multi stuff rather than this fix. I'll
> reorder patches for v2. Maybe I should also rebase the series on top of
> patches by Cong Yang. WDYT?

Sounds good. I think Cong is planning on a V6 to fix the last nit I
had on his patch series [1] but otherwise this plan sounds fine to me.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHwB_NKtw0AyMgFb4rMFNgr4WF10o9_0pYvbKpnDM45aYma9zg@mail.gmail.com

-Doug

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ