[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ea1f4d7-ddb9-43a1-91c0-477dfde87da1@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 19:25:54 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>,
Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@...il.com>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Varadarajan Narayanan
<quic_varada@...cinc.com>,
Gokul Sriram Palanisamy <quic_gokulsri@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: apss-ipq-pll: remove 'config_ctl_hi_val' from
Stromer pll configs
On 10.05.2024 6:25 PM, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote:
>
>
> On 5/10/2024 12:23 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 9.05.2024 10:08 AM, Gabor Juhos wrote:
>>> Since the CONFIG_CTL register is only 32 bits wide in the Stromer
>>> and Stromer Plus PLLs , the 'config_ctl_hi_val' values from the
>>> IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 configurations are not used so remove those.
>>>
>>> No functional changes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Hm, it sounds suspicious that we'd have these settings then.. Could somebody from
>> QC please confirm that everything's alright here?
>
>
> I checked the HW doc and yes in both IPQ5018 and IPQ5332 CONFIG_CTL_U register is not implemented. I see offset of CONFIG_CTL_U register is removed in the change[1] by Gabor.
Thanks
Acked-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists