linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Return label, if set, for IRQ only line

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=Mfq50x5RUM76yYXG9hGh4vGTO2hTgFeO8Ty1Z0p3oo_2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 19:30:17 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, 
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Return label, if set, for IRQ only line

On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 6:06 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 06:48:52PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 06:42:28PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 04:23:07PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:58 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > Fair enough but I would like to know what your bigger plan is before
> > > > picking this up.
> > >
> > > I stand corrected, this patch has an immediate effect on the generic
> > > gpiolib_dbg_show() which does *not* use the above mentioned call..
> >
> > Ah, but it doesn't use gpiod_get_label() in the else branch either...
> >
> > I want to amend the else branch there to print similar or reuse the main one.
> > For the latter I have locally a patch to modify gpiolib_dbg_show() to show
> > the interrupt lines as well even if they are not requested.
>
> I just shared that patch, if you are okay with both, it would be nice
> to have them applied.
>

Not for this merge window, we'll see in two weeks.

Bart