linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Return label, if set, for IRQ only line

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 20:47:00 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, 
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Return label, if set, for IRQ only line

On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 8:30 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 6:06 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 06:48:52PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 06:42:28PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 04:23:07PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:58 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > > <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:

..

> > > > > Fair enough but I would like to know what your bigger plan is before
> > > > > picking this up.
> > > >
> > > > I stand corrected, this patch has an immediate effect on the generic
> > > > gpiolib_dbg_show() which does *not* use the above mentioned call..
> > >
> > > Ah, but it doesn't use gpiod_get_label() in the else branch either...
> > >
> > > I want to amend the else branch there to print similar or reuse the main one.
> > > For the latter I have locally a patch to modify gpiolib_dbg_show() to show
> > > the interrupt lines as well even if they are not requested.
> >
> > I just shared that patch, if you are okay with both, it would be nice
> > to have them applied.
>
> Not for this merge window, we'll see in two weeks.

No hurry, I'm fine with your schedule.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko