| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240512132412.35d8fe36@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 13:24:12 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@...il.com>
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
ang.iglesiasg@...il.com, mazziesaccount@...il.com, ak@...klinger.de,
petre.rodan@...dimension.ro, phil@...pberrypi.com, 579lpy@...il.com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, semen.protsenko@...aro.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/9] iio: pressure: bmp280: Refactorize reading
functions
On Wed, 8 May 2024 18:52:03 +0200
Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@...il.com> wrote:
> For BMP18x, BMP28x, BME280, BMP38x the reading of the pressure
> value requires an update of the t_fine variable which happens
> through reading the temperature value.
>
> So all the bmpxxx_read_press() functions of the above sensors
> are internally calling the equivalent bmpxxx_read_temp() function
> in order to update the t_fine value. By just looking at the code
> this functionality is a bit hidden and is not easy to understand
> why those channels are not independent.
>
> This commit tries to clear these things a bit by splitting the
> bmpxxx_{read/compensate}_{temp/press/humid}() to the following:
>
> i. bmpxxx_read_{temp/press/humid}_adc(): read the raw value from
> the sensor.
>
> ii. bmpxx_calc_t_fine(): calculate the t_fine variable.
>
> iii. bmpxxx_get_t_fine(): get the t_fine variable.
>
> iv. bmpxxx_compensate_{temp/press/humid}(): compensate the adc
> values and return the calculated value.
>
> v. bmpxxx_read_{temp/press/humid}(): combine calls of the
> aforementioned functions to return the requested value.
>
> Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@...il.com>
A few minor things inline. Given I've picked up the 1st 4 patches,
please base your v7 on top of those.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-core.c | 361 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
> drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280.h | 6 -
> 2 files changed, 232 insertions(+), 135 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-core.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-core.c
> index dd5c526dacbd..a864f8db8e24 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-core.c
> @@ -288,13 +288,35 @@ static int bme280_read_calib(struct bmp280_data *data)
> *
> * Taken from BME280 datasheet, Section 4.2.3, "Compensation formula".
> */
Seems this comment should probably follow the maths which has moved.
> +static int bme280_read_humid_adc(struct bmp280_data *data, u16 *adc_humidity)
> +{
> + u16 value_humidity;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_bulk_read(data->regmap, BME280_REG_HUMIDITY_MSB,
> + &data->be16, sizeof(data->be16));
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(data->dev, "failed to read humidity\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + value_humidity = be16_to_cpu(data->be16);
> + if (value_humidity == BMP280_HUMIDITY_SKIPPED) {
> + dev_err(data->dev, "reading humidity skipped\n");
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> + *adc_humidity = value_humidity;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
..
> @@ -313,8 +335,29 @@ static u32 bme280_compensate_humidity(struct bmp280_data *data,
> *
> * Taken from datasheet, Section 3.11.3, "Compensation formula".
> */
Is this comment still relevant here? Seems it should probably move to follow
that maths.
> -static s32 bmp280_compensate_temp(struct bmp280_data *data,
> - u32 adc_temp)
> +static int bmp280_read_temp_adc(struct bmp280_data *data, u32 *adc_temp)
> +{
>
> static int bmp380_read_press(struct bmp280_data *data, int *val, int *val2)
> {
> - u32 adc_press, comp_press;
> + u32 adc_press, comp_press, t_fine;
> int ret;
>
> - /* Read and compensate for temperature so we get a reading of t_fine */
> - ret = bmp380_read_temp(data, NULL, NULL);
> + ret = bmp380_get_t_fine(data, &t_fine);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = regmap_bulk_read(data->regmap, BMP380_REG_PRESS_XLSB,
> - data->buf, sizeof(data->buf));
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(data->dev, "failed to read pressure\n");
> + ret = bmp380_read_press_adc(data, &adc_press);
> + if (ret)
> return ret;
> - }
>
> - adc_press = get_unaligned_le24(data->buf);
> - if (adc_press == BMP380_PRESS_SKIPPED) {
> - dev_err(data->dev, "reading pressure skipped\n");
> - return -EIO;
> - }
> - comp_press = bmp380_compensate_press(data, adc_press);
> + comp_press = bmp380_compensate_press(data, adc_press, t_fine);
>
> + /* IIO units are in kPa */
Probably worth keeping the reference to what the unit of the
datasheet maths is around.
> *val = comp_press;
> - /* Compensated pressure is in cPa (centipascals) */
> *val2 = 100000;
>
> return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL;
> @@ -1825,7 +1916,7 @@ static int bmp180_wait_for_eoc(struct bmp280_data *data, u8 ctrl_meas)
> return 0;
> }
> -static u32 bmp180_compensate_press(struct bmp280_data *data, u32 adc_press)
> +static u32 bmp180_compensate_press(struct bmp280_data *data, u32 adc_press,
> + s32 t_fine)
> {
> struct bmp180_calib *calib = &data->calib.bmp180;
> s32 oss = data->oversampling_press;
> @@ -1965,7 +2068,7 @@ static u32 bmp180_compensate_press(struct bmp280_data *data, u32 adc_press)
> s32 b3, b6;
> u32 b4, b7;
>
> - b6 = data->t_fine - 4000;
> + b6 = t_fine - 4000;
> x1 = (calib->B2 * (b6 * b6 >> 12)) >> 11;
> x2 = calib->AC2 * b6 >> 11;
> x3 = x1 + x2;
> @@ -1974,7 +2077,7 @@ static u32 bmp180_compensate_press(struct bmp280_data *data, u32 adc_press)
> x2 = (calib->B1 * ((b6 * b6) >> 12)) >> 16;
> x3 = (x1 + x2 + 2) >> 2;
> b4 = calib->AC4 * (u32)(x3 + 32768) >> 15;
> - b7 = (adc_press - b3) * (50000 >> oss);
> + b7 = (((u32)adc_press) - b3) * (50000 >> oss);
Casting from u32 to u32?
> if (b7 < 0x80000000)
> p = (b7 * 2) / b4;
> else
> @@ -1990,19 +2093,19 @@ static u32 bmp180_compensate_press(struct bmp280_data *data, u32 adc_press)
> static int bmp180_read_press(struct bmp280_data *data, int *val, int *val2)
> + /* IIO units are in kPa */
I think this is an unrelated improvement as original code doesn't have such a comment.
So shouldn't really be in this patch. If you want to keep it here rather than pushing it
into an additional patch, mention it in the commit message. "additional comments on base
units added for consistency" or something like that.
> *val = comp_press;
> *val2 = 1000;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists