linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: adi,axi-adc: tweak example node name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240512125252.7b4ed1fb@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 12:52:52 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
 linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: adi,axi-adc: tweak example node
 name

On Sat, 11 May 2024 14:00:40 +0100
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 04:04:38PM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> > It is always recommended to use generic node names for devicetree nodes.
> > The documentation [1] of the AXI ADC IP core says "The most important
> > part of the core is the Receiver PHY module.", so using phy as the node
> > name seems appropriate.
> > 
> > [1]: https://wiki.analog.com/resources/fpga/docs/axi_adc_ip
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>  
> 
> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> 
Sure, I guess phy is sort of applicable here.

Applied,

> Cheers,
> Conor.