linux-kernel - Re: Safety of opening up /dev/dma_heap/* to physically present users (udev uaccess tag) ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240513-auspicious-toucanet-from-heaven-f313af@penduick>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 15:51:39 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...hat.com>
To: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, 
	Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, 
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, 
	Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>, Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>, 
	John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>, "T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@...gle.com>, 
	Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>, Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>, 
	Robert Mader <robert.mader@...labora.com>, Sebastien Bacher <sebastien.bacher@...onical.com>, 
	Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, 
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Milan Zamazal <mzamazal@...hat.com>, 
	Andrey Konovalov <andrey.konovalov.ynk@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Safety of opening up /dev/dma_heap/* to physically present users
 (udev uaccess tag) ?

On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 09:42:00AM -0400, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
> Le lundi 13 mai 2024 à 10:29 +0200, Maxime Ripard a écrit :
> > On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 10:36:08AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 04:07:39PM -0400, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > Le mardi 07 mai 2024 à 21:36 +0300, Laurent Pinchart a écrit :
> > > > > Shorter term, we have a problem to solve, and the best option we have
> > > > > found so far is to rely on dma-buf heaps as a backend for the frame
> > > > > buffer allocatro helper in libcamera for the use case described above.
> > > > > This won't work in 100% of the cases, clearly. It's a stop-gap measure
> > > > > until we can do better.
> > > > 
> > > > Considering the security concerned raised on this thread with dmabuf heap
> > > > allocation not be restricted by quotas, you'd get what you want quickly with
> > > > memfd + udmabuf instead (which is accounted already).
> > > > 
> > > > It was raised that distro don't enable udmabuf, but as stated there by Hans, in
> > > > any cases distro needs to take action to make the softISP works. This
> > > > alternative is easy and does not interfere in anyway with your future plan or
> > > > the libcamera API. You could even have both dmabuf heap (for Raspbian) and the
> > > > safer memfd+udmabuf for the distro with security concerns.
> > > > 
> > > > And for the long term plan, we can certainly get closer by fixing that issue
> > > > with accounting. This issue also applied to v4l2 io-ops, so it would be nice to
> > > > find common set of helpers to fix these exporters.
> > > 
> > > Yeah if this is just for softisp, then memfd + udmabuf is also what I was
> > > about to suggest. Not just as a stopgap, but as the real official thing.
> > > 
> > > udmabuf does kinda allow you to pin memory, but we can easily fix that by
> > > adding the right accounting and then either let mlock rlimits or cgroups
> > > kernel memory limits enforce good behavior.
> > 
> > I think the main drawback with memfd is that it'll be broken for devices
> > without an IOMMU, and while you said that it's uncommon for GPUs, it's
> > definitely not for codecs and display engines.
> 
> In the context of libcamera, the allocation and the alignment done to the video
> frame is done completely blindly. In that context, there is a lot more then just
> the allocation type that can go wrong and will lead to a memory copy. The upside
> of memfd, is that the read cache will help speeding up the copies if they are
> needed.

dma-heaps provide cacheable buffers too...

> Another important point is that this is only used if the application haven't
> provided frames. If your embedded application is non-generic, and you have
> permissions to access the right heap, the application can solve your specific
> issue. But in the generic Linux space, Linux kernel API are just insufficient
> for the "just work" scenario.

... but they also provide semantics around the memory buffers that no
other allocation API do. There's at least the mediatek secure playback
series and another one that I've started to work on to allocate ECC
protected or unprotected buffers that are just the right use case for
the heaps, and the target frameworks aren't.

Maxime

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (274 bytes)