[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34da7677-9c77-4efa-ae32-e0ef9a94013d@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 15:35:43 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
Bhaskara Budiredla <bbudiredla@...vell.com>,
Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@...vell.com>, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Tuan Phan <tuanphan@...amperecomputing.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] perf pmus: Sort/merge/aggregate PMUs like
mrvl_ddr_pmu
On 2024-05-10 8:15 pm, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 11:13 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 8:16 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The mrvl_ddr_pmu is uncore and has a hexadecimal address
>>> suffix. Current PMU sorting/merging code assumes uncore PMU names
>>> start with uncore_ and have a decimal suffix. Add support for
>>> hexadecimal suffixes and add tests.
>>>
>>> v3. Rebase and move tests from pmus.c to the existing pmu.c.
>>>
>>> Ian Rogers (2):
>>> perf pmus: Sort/merge/aggregate PMUs like mrvl_ddr_pmu
>>> perf tests: Add some pmu core functionality tests
>>
>> Hi, these patches have been hanging around since March [1], it would
>> be nice to either be landing them or getting feedback on what to fix.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ian
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240329064803.3058900-1-irogers@google.com/
>
> +Tuan Phan, Robin Murphy
>
> Here is another PMU with the same suffix convention/issue:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/tree/drivers/perf/arm_dmc620_pmu.c?h=perf-tools-next#n706
There are at least one or two more as well - certainly arm_smmuv3_pmu
which I think may have been where this pattern first started. Now that
we've finally done the right thing with the parent mechanism to provide
a user-visible relationship of PMU instances to their corresponding
Devicetree/ACPI devices, hopefully we can discourage any further use of
this rather clunky trick of using the MMIO address as an identifier in
the PMU name. However there's then also stuff like dwc_pcie_pmu which
encodes a PCI ID as a hex suffix, so understanding hex suffixes in
general might still be a reasonable idea for the tool, if the
alternative would be maintaining a list of specific prefixes (even if
that would be hoped to remain fairly small).
Thanks,
Robin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists