[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fWwVNB0194npwSkW2RM0t0wYLrMKxTMXJAaquBZXRZjoA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 08:48:37 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>, Bhaskara Budiredla <bbudiredla@...vell.com>,
Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@...vell.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>, Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Tuan Phan <tuanphan@...amperecomputing.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] perf pmus: Sort/merge/aggregate PMUs like mrvl_ddr_pmu
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 7:35 AM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com> wrote:
>
> On 2024-05-10 8:15 pm, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 11:13 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 8:16 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The mrvl_ddr_pmu is uncore and has a hexadecimal address
> >>> suffix. Current PMU sorting/merging code assumes uncore PMU names
> >>> start with uncore_ and have a decimal suffix. Add support for
> >>> hexadecimal suffixes and add tests.
> >>>
> >>> v3. Rebase and move tests from pmus.c to the existing pmu.c.
> >>>
> >>> Ian Rogers (2):
> >>> perf pmus: Sort/merge/aggregate PMUs like mrvl_ddr_pmu
> >>> perf tests: Add some pmu core functionality tests
> >>
> >> Hi, these patches have been hanging around since March [1], it would
> >> be nice to either be landing them or getting feedback on what to fix.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Ian
> >>
> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240329064803.3058900-1-irogers@google.com/
> >
> > +Tuan Phan, Robin Murphy
> >
> > Here is another PMU with the same suffix convention/issue:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/tree/drivers/perf/arm_dmc620_pmu.c?h=perf-tools-next#n706
>
> There are at least one or two more as well - certainly arm_smmuv3_pmu
> which I think may have been where this pattern first started. Now that
> we've finally done the right thing with the parent mechanism to provide
> a user-visible relationship of PMU instances to their corresponding
> Devicetree/ACPI devices, hopefully we can discourage any further use of
> this rather clunky trick of using the MMIO address as an identifier in
> the PMU name. However there's then also stuff like dwc_pcie_pmu which
> encodes a PCI ID as a hex suffix, so understanding hex suffixes in
> general might still be a reasonable idea for the tool, if the
> alternative would be maintaining a list of specific prefixes (even if
> that would be hoped to remain fairly small).
Thanks Robin, the problem that Kan identified was that IBM s390 have a
PMU called cpum_cf. So the _cf is a valid hex suffix. Maybe there
needs to be a minimum hex suffix length to deal with this. We made the
0x optional in perf "raw" events like `perf stat -e 'r12abcd'...` and
now we have the problem that the word `read` is both quite a desirable
perf event name and also a valid hex encoding. We prefer the event
name if it exists, but we have to make the code more complex to deal
with this. It would be nice if we were capturing the conventions in:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/ABI/testing
Like with the sysfs-bus-event_source-* files. I'll do a v4 of these
changes and see if I can do something to document the suffixes, would
be great to get an Acked-by/Tested-by.
Thanks,
Ian
> Thanks,
> Robin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists