linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] dt-bindings: display: panel: constrain 'reg'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <778500c9-83bc-47b7-bf1d-28de44084776@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 11:07:14 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: neil.armstrong@...aro.org, Dmitry Baryshkov
 <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
 David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chris Morgan <macromorgan@...mail.com>,
 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
 Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
 Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>,
 Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
 Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>,
 Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] dt-bindings: display: panel: constrain 'reg'

On 14/05/2024 10:44, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> On 13/05/2024 18:41, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 May 2024 at 16:17, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 11:42:50AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Cleanups for display panel bindings.
>>>>
>>>> Rob, maybe you could take entire set if it applies? I based it on
>>>> linux-next, so letl me know if I need to rebase on your for-next.
>>>
>>> Applied. These 2 don't exist in my tree:
>>
>> It's most likely fine, but was there an ack from drm-misc maintainers?
>>
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lg,sw43408.yaml
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/raydium,rm69380.yaml
>>
>> Because those were added to drm-misc during the last cycle. So ideally
>> the patch should have gone through drm-misc.
>>
> 
> Exact there's a conflict on today's next, Rob can you drop them so I can apply them via drm-misc ?

It's almost the first time I see bindings picked up via drm-misc. Is
this an exception or rather new trend (which would be awesome as this is
what we prefer usually)?

Best regards,
Krzysztof