linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] dt-bindings: display: panel: constrain 'reg'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 23:09:52 +0200
From: neil.armstrong@...aro.org
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
 Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
 David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chris Morgan <macromorgan@...mail.com>,
 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
 Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
 Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>,
 Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
 Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>,
 Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] dt-bindings: display: panel: constrain 'reg'

On 14/05/2024 11:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 14/05/2024 10:44, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> On 13/05/2024 18:41, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Mon, 13 May 2024 at 16:17, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 11:42:50AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Cleanups for display panel bindings.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rob, maybe you could take entire set if it applies? I based it on
>>>>> linux-next, so letl me know if I need to rebase on your for-next.
>>>>
>>>> Applied. These 2 don't exist in my tree:
>>>
>>> It's most likely fine, but was there an ack from drm-misc maintainers?
>>>
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lg,sw43408.yaml
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/raydium,rm69380.yaml
>>>
>>> Because those were added to drm-misc during the last cycle. So ideally
>>> the patch should have gone through drm-misc.
>>>
>>
>> Exact there's a conflict on today's next, Rob can you drop them so I can apply them via drm-misc ?
> 
> It's almost the first time I see bindings picked up via drm-misc. Is
> this an exception or rather new trend (which would be awesome as this is
> what we prefer usually)?

I usually pick up bindings along drivers like other subsystems, and when reviewed I
take independent bindings fixes aswell when rob doesn't pick them before.

Neil

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>