linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] arch/powerpc: hotplug driver bridge support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 17:35:48 +0530
From: krishna kumar <krishnak@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: nathanl@...ux.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, npiggin@...il.com, gbatra@...ux.ibm.com,
        bhelgaas@...gle.com, tpearson@...torengineering.com, oohall@...il.com,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        mahesh.salgaonkar@...ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arch/powerpc: hotplug driver bridge support

Thanks Andy for review. I have incorporated your comments and will be 
sending the patch soon.

On 5/11/24 11:12, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Thu, May 09, 2024 at 05:35:54PM +0530, Krishna Kumar kirjoitti:
>> There is an issue with the hotplug operation when it's done on the
>> bridge/switch slot. The bridge-port and devices behind the bridge, which
>> become offline by hot-unplug operation, don't get hot-plugged/enabled by
>> doing hot-plug operation on that slot. Only the first port of the bridge
>> gets enabled and the remaining port/devices remain unplugged. The hot
>> plug/unplug operation is done by the hotplug driver
>> (drivers/pci/hotplug/pnv_php.c).
>>
>> Root Cause Analysis: This behavior is due to missing code for the DPC
>> switch/bridge. The existing driver depends on pci_hp_add_devices()
>> function for device enablement. This function calls pci_scan_slot() on
>> only one device-node/port of the bridge, not on all the siblings'
>> device-node/port.
>>
>> The missing code needs to be added which will find all the sibling
>> device-nodes/bridge-ports and will run explicit pci_scan_slot() on
>> those.  A new function has been added for this purpose which gets
>> invoked from pci_hp_add_devices(). This new function
>> pci_traverse_sibling_nodes_and_scan_slot() gets all the sibling
>> bridge-ports by traversal and explicitly invokes pci_scan_slot on them.
>>
>>
> One blank line is enough here.
I have incorporated this.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar <krishnak@...ux.ibm.com>
> ...
>
>> +void *pci_traverse_sibling_nodes_and_scan_slot(struct device_node *start, struct pci_bus *bus)
>> +{
>> +	struct device_node *dn;
>> +	struct device_node *parent;
>> +	int slotno;
>> +
>> +	const __be32 *classp1;
>> +	u32 class1 = 0;
>> +	classp1 = of_get_property(start->child, "class-code", NULL);
>> +	if (classp1)
>> +		class1 = of_read_number(classp1, 1);
> What's wrong with of_property_read_u32()?
I have incorporated this.
>
>
>> +	/* Call of pci_scan_slot for non-bridge/EP case */
>> +	if (!((class1 >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI)) {
>> +		slotno = PCI_SLOT(PCI_DN(start->child)->devfn);
>> +		pci_scan_slot(bus, PCI_DEVFN(slotno, 0));
>> +		return NULL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Iterate all siblings */
>> +	parent = start;
>> +	for_each_child_of_node(parent, dn) {
>> +		const __be32 *classp;
>> +		u32 class = 0;
>> +
>> +		classp = of_get_property(dn, "class-code", NULL);
>> +		if (classp)
>> +			class = of_read_number(classp, 1);
> Ditto.
>
>> +		/* Call of pci_scan_slot on each sibling-nodes/bridge-ports */
>> +		if ((class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI) {
>> +			slotno = PCI_SLOT(PCI_DN(dn)->devfn);
>> +			pci_scan_slot(bus, PCI_DEVFN(slotno, 0));
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return NULL;
>> +}

Best Regards,

Krishna