linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/35] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code to /fs/resctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZkOAhH6tm1NXpre2@e133380.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 16:17:24 +0100
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
	D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
	carl@...amperecomputing.com, lcherian@...vell.com,
	bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com,
	"Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)" <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>,
	baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
	Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>, dfustini@...libre.com,
	amitsinght@...vell.com, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
	Rex Nie <rex.nie@...uarmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/35] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code
 to /fs/resctrl

Hi Reinette,

On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 08:41:37AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> On 4/26/2024 8:05 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> > This is a respin of the resctrl refactoring series described below,
> > addressing review feedback.  Many thanks to those to responded with
> > feedback on the v1 series [2].
> > 
> > See Notes and FYIs in the individual patches for details on the changes
> > and outstanding issues.
> 
> What are your expectations regarding this series while considering [1] and [2]?
> 
> Reinette
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZiE8%2foXyjBef2qTy@e133380.arm.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/acce93e6-4c8e-472d-a2bc-5cbad2950661@intel.com/
> 

I plan to propose a reworked version of the fflags and string parser
stuff, and take a look at the other more minor outstanding issues.

The series does need rebasing, but otherwise I don't anticipate much
change to the code from the Arm side unless there are further review
comments.

Do you have a preference on how this series should proceed?

Cheers
---Dave