linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/35] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code to /fs/resctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <64113803-e4b8-49a2-a217-e1be790872fe@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 08:56:41 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
CC: <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, James Morse
	<james.morse@....com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Thomas Gleixner
	<tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov
	<bp@...en8.de>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Babu Moger
	<Babu.Moger@....com>, <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>, "D Scott
 Phillips OS" <scott@...amperecomputing.com>, <carl@...amperecomputing.com>,
	<lcherian@...vell.com>, <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>, "Shaopeng Tan
 (Fujitsu)" <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>, <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	"Jamie Iles" <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>, Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>, <dfustini@...libre.com>,
	<amitsinght@...vell.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Rex Nie
	<rex.nie@...uarmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/35] x86/resctrl: Move the resctrl filesystem code to
 /fs/resctrl

Hi Dave,

On 5/14/2024 8:17 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 08:41:37AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> On 4/26/2024 8:05 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
>>> This is a respin of the resctrl refactoring series described below,
>>> addressing review feedback.  Many thanks to those to responded with
>>> feedback on the v1 series [2].
>>>
>>> See Notes and FYIs in the individual patches for details on the changes
>>> and outstanding issues.
>>
>> What are your expectations regarding this series while considering [1] and [2]?
>>
>> Reinette
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZiE8%2foXyjBef2qTy@e133380.arm.com/
>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/acce93e6-4c8e-472d-a2bc-5cbad2950661@intel.com/
>>
> 
> I plan to propose a reworked version of the fflags and string parser
> stuff, and take a look at the other more minor outstanding issues.
> 
> The series does need rebasing, but otherwise I don't anticipate much
> change to the code from the Arm side unless there are further review
> comments.
> 
> Do you have a preference on how this series should proceed?

I believe that I already answered this question in [2], hence my confusion
about this posting. 

Reinette