linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] regulator: dt-bindings: rtq2208: Add property to get ldo of RTQ2208 is adjustable or not

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240515-rubdown-waffle-b0d59302d436@spud>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 16:48:32 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Alina Yu <alina_yu@...htek.com>, lgirdwood@...il.com,
	robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, johnny_lai@...htek.com,
	cy_huang@...htek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] regulator: dt-bindings: rtq2208: Add property to
 get ldo of RTQ2208 is adjustable or not

On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 01:10:31PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 07:01:21PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> 
> > It also doesn't seem like this sort of behaviour would be limited to
> > Richtek either, should this actually be a common property in
> > regulator.yaml w/o the vendor prefix?
> 
> It's a pretty weird thing for hardware to do - usually if the regulator
> is controllable it'll be qualified for use within whatever range it's
> variable over and not some other completely disjoint value.

Okay cool, just the commit message/description to be changed then.
Thanks for the info

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)