linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] drm for 6.10-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPM=9tyHnK_ReDmFf0eUGGuvKpXJQ0VWuKKhDqJt89URjOTU_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 10:06:27 +1000
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>
Cc: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@....com>, 
	Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>, 
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>, 
	dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm for 6.10-rc1

On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 09:50, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 06:29, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 13:24, Linus Torvalds
> > <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have to revert both
> > >
> > >   a68c7eaa7a8f ("drm/amdgpu: Enable clear page functionality")
> > >   e362b7c8f8c7 ("drm/amdgpu: Modify the contiguous flags behaviour")
> > >
> > > to make things build cleanly. Next step: see if it boots and fixes the
> > > problem for me.
> >
> > Well, perhaps not surprisingly, the WARN_ON() no longer triggers with
> > this, and everything looks fine.
> >
> > Let's see if the machine ends up being stable now. It took several
> > hours for the "scary messages" state to turn into the "hung machine"
> > state, so they *could* have been independent issues, but it seems a
> > bit unlikely.
>
> I think that should be fine to do for now.
>
> I think it is also fine to do like I've attached, but I'm not sure if
> I'd take that chance.

Scrap that idea, doesn't die, but it makes my system unhappy, like
fbdev missing,

so for quickest path forward, just make the two reverts seems best.

I've reproduced it here, so I'll track it down,

Dave.