linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] drm for 6.10-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPM=9ty+FH0wW-vuw3H6jE_qg-PimR7pqSSJDNLgyYO1NC+-XA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 12:42:31 +1000
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>
Cc: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@....com>, 
	Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>, 
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>, 
	dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm for 6.10-rc1

On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 10:06, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 09:50, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 06:29, Linus Torvalds
> > <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 13:24, Linus Torvalds
> > > <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have to revert both
> > > >
> > > >   a68c7eaa7a8f ("drm/amdgpu: Enable clear page functionality")
> > > >   e362b7c8f8c7 ("drm/amdgpu: Modify the contiguous flags behaviour")
> > > >
> > > > to make things build cleanly. Next step: see if it boots and fixes the
> > > > problem for me.
> > >
> > > Well, perhaps not surprisingly, the WARN_ON() no longer triggers with
> > > this, and everything looks fine.
> > >
> > > Let's see if the machine ends up being stable now. It took several
> > > hours for the "scary messages" state to turn into the "hung machine"
> > > state, so they *could* have been independent issues, but it seems a
> > > bit unlikely.
> >
> > I think that should be fine to do for now.
> >
> > I think it is also fine to do like I've attached, but I'm not sure if
> > I'd take that chance.
>
> Scrap that idea, doesn't die, but it makes my system unhappy, like
> fbdev missing,
>
> so for quickest path forward, just make the two reverts seems best.
>
> I've reproduced it here, so I'll track it down,

https://lore.kernel.org/amd-gfx/20240514145636.16253-1-Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com/T/#t

This patch seems to fix it for me, I might just pull it into my tree
and send it to you.

Dave.