lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 12:09:04 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, 
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>, Armin Wolf <w_armin@....de>, 
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ACPI: EC: Install EC address space handler at the
 namespace root

Hi,

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 11:50 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 5/16/24 10:37 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:35 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hatcom> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 5/15/24 9:39 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> Hi Everyone,
> >>>
> >>> This is an update of
> >>>
> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/5787281.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher/
> >>>
> >>> which was a follow up for the discussion in:
> >>>
> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/CAJZ5v0hiXdv08PRcop7oSYqgr_g5rwzRTj7HgdNCCGjXeV44zA@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
> >>>
> >>> Patch [1/2] has been updated to avoid possible issues related to
> >>> systems with defective platform firmware and patch [2/2] is a resend
> >>> with a couple of tags added.
> >>
> >> Thanks, the series looks good to me:
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> >>
> >> for the series.
> >>
> >> I assume you are going to send this in as a fix for 6.10 ?
> >
> > Yes, I am.
> >
> >> In that case feel free to merge both patches through the
> >> linux-pm tree.
> >
> > Thank you!
>
> Hmm, I just realized that this:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=c663b26972eae7d2a614f584c92a266fe9a2d44c
>
> Is part of the main pdx86 pull-request for 6.10 which I'm going to
> send to Linus in the next 10 minutes or so. So that is going to
> conflict with your 2/2.
>
> Options:
>
> a) You only send 1/2 upstream as a fix and I'll then send a rebased
> 2/2 upstream as part of the first pdx86 pull-request.
>
> b) You merge the git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git
> platform-drivers-x86-v6.10-1 tag (which is the tag for the pull-request
> I'm about to send to Linus) and rebase on top of that before sending
> a pull-request for both to Linus.

I would rather wait for Linus to merge your PR and merge my changes on
top of his merge.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ