linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ACPI: EC: Install EC address space handler at the namespace root

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2e5c9108-9ca4-4d7c-a062-2a9a5baaf06e@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 12:13:54 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
 Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, LKML
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
 Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>, Armin Wolf <w_armin@....de>,
 Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ACPI: EC: Install EC address space handler at the
 namespace root

Hi,

On 5/16/24 12:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 11:50 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 5/16/24 10:37 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:35 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 5/15/24 9:39 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> This is an update of
>>>>>
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/5787281.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher/
>>>>>
>>>>> which was a follow up for the discussion in:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/CAJZ5v0hiXdv08PRcop7oSYqgr_g5rwzRTj7HgdNCCGjXeV44zA@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
>>>>>
>>>>> Patch [1/2] has been updated to avoid possible issues related to
>>>>> systems with defective platform firmware and patch [2/2] is a resend
>>>>> with a couple of tags added.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, the series looks good to me:
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>>>>
>>>> for the series.
>>>>
>>>> I assume you are going to send this in as a fix for 6.10 ?
>>>
>>> Yes, I am.
>>>
>>>> In that case feel free to merge both patches through the
>>>> linux-pm tree.
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>
>> Hmm, I just realized that this:
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=c663b26972eae7d2a614f584c92a266fe9a2d44c
>>
>> Is part of the main pdx86 pull-request for 6.10 which I'm going to
>> send to Linus in the next 10 minutes or so. So that is going to
>> conflict with your 2/2.
>>
>> Options:
>>
>> a) You only send 1/2 upstream as a fix and I'll then send a rebased
>> 2/2 upstream as part of the first pdx86 pull-request.
>>
>> b) You merge the git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git
>> platform-drivers-x86-v6.10-1 tag (which is the tag for the pull-request
>> I'm about to send to Linus) and rebase on top of that before sending
>> a pull-request for both to Linus.
> 
> I would rather wait for Linus to merge your PR and merge my changes on
> top of his merge.

That is fine too. I just send out the pull-request so hopefully Linus will
merge it soon(ish).

Note (stating the obvious) when rebasing 2/2 you will pretty much need to
remove all the new code added by:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/commit/?id=c663b26972eae7d2a614f584c92a266fe9a2d44c

Regards,

Hans