[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bk54y1vl.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 16:06:30 +0206
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>, Steven Rostedt
<rostedt@...dmis.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v5 06/30] printk: nbcon: Add callbacks to
synchronize with driver
On 2024-05-17, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
> BTW: I wonder if you use AI for generating the commit message.
> My experience is that AI produces longer fancy sentences
> which might be good for a novel but they sometimes hide
> the important details.
I do not know if that is a compliment or an insult.
For the record, I do not use AI. The "long fancy sentences hiding
important details" are coming from a sober brain... mine.
> My attempt of a more strightforwward explanation:
[...]
Your version does not mention why the generic code now needs to use the
driver-specific locking, but I suppose that does not matter (and only
adds confusion instead of explanation).
I will use your version.
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Thanks.
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists