[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZkdsUjP9CLCdY0kw@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 16:40:18 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v5 06/30] printk: nbcon: Add callbacks to
synchronize with driver
On Fri 2024-05-17 16:06:30, John Ogness wrote:
> On 2024-05-17, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
> > BTW: I wonder if you use AI for generating the commit message.
> > My experience is that AI produces longer fancy sentences
> > which might be good for a novel but they sometimes hide
> > the important details.
>
> I do not know if that is a compliment or an insult.
>
> For the record, I do not use AI. The "long fancy sentences hiding
> important details" are coming from a sober brain... mine.
Ah, take it as a complaint then ;-) Complicated things are just hard
to explain.
> > My attempt of a more strightforwward explanation:
>
> [...]
>
> Your version does not mention why the generic code now needs to use the
> driver-specific locking, but I suppose that does not matter (and only
> adds confusion instead of explanation).
I removed these details on purpose. I think that they will be
easier to understand with the code.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists