[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240518001806.work.381-kees@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 17:18:07 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] selftests: drivers/s390x: Use SKIP() during FIXTURE_SETUP
Instead of mixing selftest harness and ksft helpers, perform SKIP
testing from the FIXTURE_SETUPs. This also means TEST_HARNESS_MAIN does
not need to be open-coded.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
---
I wasn't able to build or run test this, since it's very s390 specific, it seems?
---
.../drivers/s390x/uvdevice/test_uvdevice.c | 32 ++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/s390x/uvdevice/test_uvdevice.c b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/s390x/uvdevice/test_uvdevice.c
index ea0cdc37b44f..9622fac42597 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/s390x/uvdevice/test_uvdevice.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/s390x/uvdevice/test_uvdevice.c
@@ -18,6 +18,16 @@
#define UV_PATH "/dev/uv"
#define BUFFER_SIZE 0x200
+
+#define open_uv() \
+do { \
+ self->uv_fd = open(UV_PATH, O_ACCMODE); \
+ if (self->uv_fd < 0) \
+ SKIP(return, "No uv-device or cannot access " UV_PATH "\n" \
+ "Enable CONFIG_S390_UV_UAPI and check the access rights on " \
+ UV_PATH ".\n"); \
+} while (0)
+
FIXTURE(uvio_fixture) {
int uv_fd;
struct uvio_ioctl_cb uvio_ioctl;
@@ -37,7 +47,7 @@ FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(uvio_fixture, att) {
FIXTURE_SETUP(uvio_fixture)
{
- self->uv_fd = open(UV_PATH, O_ACCMODE);
+ open_uv();
self->uvio_ioctl.argument_addr = (__u64)self->buffer;
self->uvio_ioctl.argument_len = variant->arg_size;
@@ -159,7 +169,7 @@ FIXTURE(attest_fixture) {
FIXTURE_SETUP(attest_fixture)
{
- self->uv_fd = open(UV_PATH, O_ACCMODE);
+ open_uv();
self->uvio_ioctl.argument_addr = (__u64)&self->uvio_attest;
self->uvio_ioctl.argument_len = sizeof(self->uvio_attest);
@@ -257,20 +267,4 @@ TEST_F(attest_fixture, att_inval_addr)
att_inval_addr_test(&self->uvio_attest.meas_addr, _metadata, self);
}
-static void __attribute__((constructor)) __constructor_order_last(void)
-{
- if (!__constructor_order)
- __constructor_order = _CONSTRUCTOR_ORDER_BACKWARD;
-}
-
-int main(int argc, char **argv)
-{
- int fd = open(UV_PATH, O_ACCMODE);
-
- if (fd < 0)
- ksft_exit_skip("No uv-device or cannot access " UV_PATH "\n"
- "Enable CONFIG_S390_UV_UAPI and check the access rights on "
- UV_PATH ".\n");
- close(fd);
- return test_harness_run(argc, argv);
-}
+TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists