[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d97d966e-bc95-4d43-83ad-b368ed7d7e71@web.de>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 17:47:12 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@...roma2.it>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
David Lebrun <david.lebrun@...ouvain.be>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ahmed Abdelsalam <ahabdels.dev@...il.com>,
Paolo Lungaroni <paolo.lungaroni@...roma2.it>,
Stefano Salsano <stefano.salsano@...roma2.it>
Subject: Re: [net] ipv6: sr: fix missing sk_buff release in seg6_input_core
* The message subject would have been a bit nicer with the key word “PATCH”.
* How do you think about to append parentheses to the function name?
…
> The proposed patch addresses the identified memory leak by …
Will a corresponding imperative wording be more desirable for
an improved change description?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.9#n94
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists