[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZksXKaT2514B71QL@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 12:26:01 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Cc: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@...com>, mchehab@...nel.org,
hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com,
sebastian.fricke@...labora.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, adobriyan@...il.com,
jani.nikula@...el.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, airlied@...il.com,
daniel@...ll.ch, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, praneeth@...com, nm@...com,
vigneshr@...com, a-bhatia1@...com, j-luthra@...com, b-brnich@...com,
detheridge@...com, p-mantena@...com, vijayp@...com,
andrzej.p@...labora.com, nicolas@...fresne.ca, davidgow@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 07/10] lib: add basic KUnit test for lib/math
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 01:53:47PM -0700, Daniel Latypov wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 1:14 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
..
> > > [devarsht: Rebase to 6.9 and change license to GPL]
> >
> > I'm not sure that you may change license. It needs the author's confirmation.
>
> Checking, this is referring to the MODULE_LICENSE, which used to be
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>
> and is now
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
> If checkpatch is suggesting that now, then changing it sounds good to me.
In this case I agree on the change as it's purely syntax and not semantic.
> > > ---
> > > Changes since v6:
> > > * Rebase to linux-next, change license to GPL as suggested by checkpatch.
> >
> > Note, checkpatch.pl is not false positives free. Be careful
> > with what it suggests.
> >
> > > +#include <kunit/test.h>
> > > +#include <linux/gcd.h>
> >
> > > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> >
> > Do you know why this header is included?
>
> I think I had put it in the original before a lot of the work you did
> to split things out of kernel.h.
> I haven't had time to look apply this patch series locally yet, but
> I'd be pretty sure we can remove it without anything breaking.
Briefly looking at the code I even not sure it was needed before, but maybe
I missed something, in any case, please remove / replace it.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists