[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGFuAuyXhBT8Nkvz5qN8iejeoHMFmx1b86tTNmpVfQ2xqjMtLw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 15:30:43 +0200
From: grygorii tertychnyi <grembeter@...il.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Grygorii Tertychnyi <grygorii.tertychnyi@...ca-geosystems.com>,
bsp-development.geo@...ca-geosystems.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: ocores: set IACK bit after core is enabled
On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 7:25 AM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> wrote:
>
> …
> > Sometimes it causes failure for the very first message transfer, …
>
> Does such an information indicate the need for the tag “Fixes”?
I'm not sure: the original initialization order was introduced by the
very first commit
18f98b1e3147 ("[PATCH] i2c: New bus driver for the OpenCores I2C controller").
Regards,
Grygorii
Powered by blists - more mailing lists