| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 16:31:31 -0500 From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com> To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, tiwai@...e.com, cezary.rojewski@...el.com, peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com, yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com, ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com, kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, bgoswami@...cinc.com, daniel.baluta@....com, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org, sound-open-firmware@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: topology: Constify an argument of snd_soc_tplg_component_load() On 5/20/24 08:24, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 10:34:33AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: >> Le 14/05/2024 à 12:21, Mark Brown a écrit : > >>> As mentioned in submitting-patches.rst when submitting a patch series >>> you should supply a cover letter for that patch series which describes >>> the overall content of the series. This helps people understand what >>> they are looking at and how things fit together. > >> Ok. >> I usually do, but I thought that the subjects were self-explanatory enough >> in this case. > >> Do you want me to resend? > > It's fine this time. no issues with https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/4993, so Tested-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists