[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zkz5WtB0pBLqlc+3@hu-bjorande-lv.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 12:43:22 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>
To: prabhav kumar <pvkumar5749404@...il.com>
CC: <andersson@...nel.org>, <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<julia.lawall@...ia.fr>, <javier.carrasco@...fvision.net>,
<skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] drivers: soc: qcom: Auto cleanup using
__free(device_node)
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 01:01:22AM +0530, prabhav kumar wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 12:50 AM Bjorn Andersson
> <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 12:53:30PM +0530, Prabhav Kumar Vaish wrote:
> > > Use automated cleanup to replace of_node_put() in qcom_smem_resolve_mem().
> > >
> >
> > I don't find this easier to read or maintain.
> Should I change it , explaining the change ??
> >
> > Also, your subject prefix does not match other changes to this driver.
> The patch is to add a __free function attribute to np pointer
> initialization ensuring
> the pointers are freed as soon as they go out of scope, thus removing
> the work to
> manually free them using of_node_put.
Yes, that is what the __free() attribute does, but I don't find it
easier to read and unless I'm missing something you're not fixing an
actual issue here?
Regards,
Bjorn
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bjorn
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Prabhav Kumar Vaish <pvkumar5749404@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/soc/qcom/smem.c | 4 +---
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/smem.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/smem.c
> > > index 7191fa0c087f..ad1cf8dcc6ec 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/smem.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/smem.c
> > > @@ -1032,18 +1032,16 @@ static int qcom_smem_resolve_mem(struct qcom_smem *smem, const char *name,
> > > struct smem_region *region)
> > > {
> > > struct device *dev = smem->dev;
> > > - struct device_node *np;
> > > struct resource r;
> > > int ret;
> > > + struct device_node *np __free(device_node) = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, name, 0);
> > >
> > > - np = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, name, 0);
> > > if (!np) {
> > > dev_err(dev, "No %s specified\n", name);
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > ret = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &r);
> > > - of_node_put(np);
> > > if (ret)
> > > return ret;
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists