[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240521083221.GCZkxcFSautABFdQmg@fat_crate.local>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 10:32:21 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/49] New Intel CPUID families
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 03:45:31PM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> tl;dr
> - Please consider patches 0001 & 0002 as urgent to fix a regression.
1 and 2?
Only 2 I think...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists