[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <466e5359-067c-4ab5-9476-06daa44dc83d@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 09:11:08 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/latency-collector: fix -Wformat-security compile
warns
On 4/3/24 19:10, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Fix the following -Wformat-security compile warnings adding missing
> format arguments:
>
> latency-collector.c: In function ‘show_available’:
> latency-collector.c:938:17: warning: format not a string literal and
> no format arguments [-Wformat-security]
> 938 | warnx(no_tracer_msg);
> | ^~~~~
>
> latency-collector.c:943:17: warning: format not a string literal and
> no format arguments [-Wformat-security]
> 943 | warnx(no_latency_tr_msg);
> | ^~~~~
>
> latency-collector.c: In function ‘find_default_tracer’:
> latency-collector.c:986:25: warning: format not a string literal and
> no format arguments [-Wformat-security]
> 986 | errx(EXIT_FAILURE, no_tracer_msg);
> |
> ^~~~
> latency-collector.c: In function ‘scan_arguments’:
> latency-collector.c:1881:33: warning: format not a string literal and
> no format arguments [-Wformat-security]
> 1881 | errx(EXIT_FAILURE, no_tracer_msg);
> | ^~~~
>
> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
> ---
> tools/tracing/latency/latency-collector.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/tracing/latency/latency-collector.c b/tools/tracing/latency/latency-collector.c
> index 0fd9c747d396..cf263fe9deaf 100644
> --- a/tools/tracing/latency/latency-collector.c
> +++ b/tools/tracing/latency/latency-collector.c
> @@ -935,12 +935,12 @@ static void show_available(void)
> }
>
> if (!tracers) {
> - warnx(no_tracer_msg);
> + warnx("%s", no_tracer_msg);
> return;
> }
>
> if (!found) {
> - warnx(no_latency_tr_msg);
> + warnx("%s", no_latency_tr_msg);
> tracefs_list_free(tracers);
> return;
> }
> @@ -983,7 +983,7 @@ static const char *find_default_tracer(void)
> for (i = 0; relevant_tracers[i]; i++) {
> valid = tracer_valid(relevant_tracers[i], ¬racer);
> if (notracer)
> - errx(EXIT_FAILURE, no_tracer_msg);
> + errx(EXIT_FAILURE, "%s", no_tracer_msg);
> if (valid)
> return relevant_tracers[i];
> }
> @@ -1878,7 +1878,7 @@ static void scan_arguments(int argc, char *argv[])
> }
> valid = tracer_valid(current_tracer, ¬racer);
> if (notracer)
> - errx(EXIT_FAILURE, no_tracer_msg);
> + errx(EXIT_FAILURE, "%s", no_tracer_msg);
> if (!valid)
> errx(EXIT_FAILURE,
> "The tracer %s is not supported by your kernel!\n", current_tracer);
Any thoughts on this patch?
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists