[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a553622c-7576-4662-abac-68abe7ea7918@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 12:21:57 -0700
From: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson
<andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Loic
Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
Mathieu
Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<wcn36xx@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd
Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] remoteproc: qcom_wcnss: make use of QCOM_FW_HELPER
On 5/21/2024 2:45 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Make the driver use qcom_fw_helper to autodetect the path to the
> calibration data file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
> index 421a3943a90d..45fc578ae30b 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> #include <linux/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.h>
> +#include <linux/soc/qcom/fw_helper.h>
> #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem.h>
> #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem_state.h>
>
> @@ -555,8 +556,13 @@ static int wcnss_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL)
> return ret;
>
> + fw_name = qcom_get_board_fw(fw_name);
> + if (!fw_name)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(&pdev->dev, pdev->name, &wcnss_ops,
> fw_name, sizeof(*wcnss));
> + kfree(fw_name);
> if (!rproc) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
> return -ENOMEM;
>
can you cleanly bisect to this patch? seems it depends upon patch 10.
should 09 & 10 be swapped, or perhaps squashed?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists