linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/12] remoteproc: qcom_wcnss: make use of QCOM_FW

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAA8EJpoU+C03QC0PaUOYF8oVT+qY+eCRODZPjHCuT3FzQc1WKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 23:42:31 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, 
	Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>, 
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, wcn36xx@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] remoteproc: qcom_wcnss: make use of QCOM_FW_HELPER

On Wed, 22 May 2024 at 22:22, Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/21/2024 2:45 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > Make the driver use qcom_fw_helper to autodetect the path to the
> > calibration data file.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
> > index 421a3943a90d..45fc578ae30b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c
> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> >  #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> >  #include <linux/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.h>
> > +#include <linux/soc/qcom/fw_helper.h>
> >  #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem.h>
> >  #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem_state.h>
> >
> > @@ -555,8 +556,13 @@ static int wcnss_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >       if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL)
> >               return ret;
> >
> > +     fw_name = qcom_get_board_fw(fw_name);
> > +     if (!fw_name)
> > +             return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> >       rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(&pdev->dev, pdev->name, &wcnss_ops,
> >                                fw_name, sizeof(*wcnss));
> > +     kfree(fw_name);
> >       if (!rproc) {
> >               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to allocate remoteproc\n");
> >               return -ENOMEM;
> >
>
> can you cleanly bisect to this patch? seems it depends upon patch 10.
> should 09 & 10 be swapped, or perhaps squashed?

Yes. I think I got this mixed during rebasing and squashing of the
changes. For v2, if the approach is found to be generally acceptable,
I'll squash them.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry