| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240522221034.GA83828@bhelgaas>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 17:10:34 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Minda Chen <minda.chen@...rfivetech.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Mason Huo <mason.huo@...rfivetech.com>,
Leyfoon Tan <leyfoon.tan@...rfivetech.com>,
Kevin Xie <kevin.xie@...rfivetech.com>
Subject: Re: 回复: [PATCH v16 08/22] PCI: microchip: Change the argument of
plda_pcie_setup_iomems()
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 01:50:57AM +0000, Minda Chen wrote:
> > The patch is OK, but the subject line is not very informative. It
> > should be useful all by itself even without the commit log.
> > "Change the argument of X" doesn't say anything about why we would
> > want to do that.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 05:18:21PM +0800, Minda Chen wrote:
> > > If other vendor do not select PCI_HOST_COMMON, the driver data is not
> > > struct pci_host_bridge.
> >
> > Also, I don't think this is the real problem. Your PCIE_MICROCHIP_HOST
> > Kconfig selects PCI_HOST_COMMON, and the driver calls
> > pci_host_common_probe(), so the driver wouldn't even build without
> > PCI_HOST_COMMON.
> >
> > This patch is already applied and ready to go, but if you can tell
> > us what's really going on here, I'd like to update the commit log.
> >
> It is modified for Starfive code. Starfive JH7110 PCIe do not select
> PCI_HOST_COMMON
> plda_pcie_setup_iomems() will be changed to common plda code.
>
> I think I can modify the title and commit log like this.
>
> Title:
> PCI: microchip: Get struct pci_host_bridge pointer from platform code
>
> Since plda_pcie_setup_iomems() will be a common PLDA core driver
> function, but the argument0 is a struct platform_device pointer.
> plda_pcie_setup_iomems() actually using struct pci_host_bridge
> pointer other than platform_device pointer. Further more if a new
> PLDA core PCIe driver do not select PCI_HOST_COMMON, the platform
> driver data is not struct pci_host_bridge pointer. So get struct
> pci_host_bridge pointer from platform code function
> mc_platform_init() and make it to be an argument of
> plda_pcie_setup_iomems().
OK, I see what you're doing. This actually has nothing to do with
whether PCI_HOST_COMMON is *enabled*. It has to do with whether
drivers use pci_host_common_probe(). Here's what I propose:
PCI: plda: Pass pci_host_bridge to plda_pcie_setup_iomems()
plda_pcie_setup_iomems() needs the bridge->windows list from struct
pci_host_bridge and is currently used only by pcie-microchip-host.c. This
driver uses pci_host_common_probe(), which sets a pci_host_bridge as the
drvdata, so plda_pcie_setup_iomems() used platform_get_drvdata() to find
the pci_host_bridge.
But we also want to use plda_pcie_setup_iomems() in the new pcie-starfive.c
driver, which does not use pci_host_common_probe() and will have struct
starfive_jh7110_pcie as its drvdata, so pass the pci_host_bridge directly
to plda_pcie_setup_iomems() so it doesn't need platform_get_drvdata() to
find it.
> > > Move calling platform_get_drvdata() to mc_platform_init().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Minda Chen <minda.chen@...rfivetech.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c | 6 +++---
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > > b/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > > index 9b367927cd32..805870aed61d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > > @@ -876,11 +876,10 @@ static void plda_pcie_setup_window(void __iomem
> > *bridge_base_addr, u32 index,
> > > writel(0, bridge_base_addr + ATR0_PCIE_WIN0_SRC_ADDR); }
> > >
> > > -static int plda_pcie_setup_iomems(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > > +static int plda_pcie_setup_iomems(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge,
> > > struct plda_pcie_rp *port)
> > > {
> > > void __iomem *bridge_base_addr = port->bridge_addr;
> > > - struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > struct resource_entry *entry;
> > > u64 pci_addr;
> > > u32 index = 1;
> > > @@ -1018,6 +1017,7 @@ static int mc_platform_init(struct
> > > pci_config_window *cfg) {
> > > struct device *dev = cfg->parent;
> > > struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> > > + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > void __iomem *bridge_base_addr =
> > > port->axi_base_addr + MC_PCIE_BRIDGE_ADDR;
> > > int ret;
> > > @@ -1031,7 +1031,7 @@ static int mc_platform_init(struct
> > pci_config_window *cfg)
> > > mc_pcie_enable_msi(port, cfg->win);
> > >
> > > /* Configure non-config space outbound ranges */
> > > - ret = plda_pcie_setup_iomems(pdev, &port->plda);
> > > + ret = plda_pcie_setup_iomems(bridge, &port->plda);
> > > if (ret)
> > > return ret;
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists