linux-kernel - 回复: [PATCH v16 08/22] PCI: microchip: Change the argument of plda_pcie_setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <SHXPR01MB086351396027D8A443BB6068E6EB2@SHXPR01MB0863.CHNPR01.prod.partner.outlook.cn>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 01:50:57 +0000
From: Minda Chen <minda.chen@...rfivetech.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
	<conor@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Wilczy��ski <kw@...ux.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Thomas
 Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com>,
	Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>, Krzysztof
 Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer
 Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Philipp
 Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Mason Huo <mason.huo@...rfivetech.com>,
	Leyfoon Tan <leyfoon.tan@...rfivetech.com>, Kevin Xie
	<kevin.xie@...rfivetech.com>
Subject:
 回复: [PATCH v16 08/22] PCI: microchip: Change the argument of plda_pcie_setup_iomems()



> 
> The patch is OK, but the subject line is not very informative.  It should be useful
> all by itself even without the commit log.  "Change the argument of X" doesn't
> say anything about why we would want to do that.
> 
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 05:18:21PM +0800, Minda Chen wrote:
> > If other vendor do not select PCI_HOST_COMMON, the driver data is not
> > struct pci_host_bridge.
> 
> Also, I don't think this is the real problem.  Your PCIE_MICROCHIP_HOST
> Kconfig selects PCI_HOST_COMMON, and the driver calls
> pci_host_common_probe(), so the driver wouldn't even build without
> PCI_HOST_COMMON.
> 
> This patch is already applied and ready to go, but if you can tell us what's really
> going on here, I'd like to update the commit log.
> 
It is modified for Starfive code. Starfive JH7110 PCIe do not select
PCI_HOST_COMMON
plda_pcie_setup_iomems() will be changed to common plda code.

I think I can modify the title and commit log like this.

Title: 
PCI: microchip: Get struct pci_host_bridge pointer from platform code

Since plda_pcie_setup_iomems() will be a common PLDA core driver function, but the 
argument0 is a struct platform_device pointer. plda_pcie_setup_iomems() actually
using struct pci_host_bridge pointer other than platform_device pointer. Further
more if a new PLDA core PCIe driver do not select PCI_HOST_COMMON, the platform
driver data is not struct pci_host_bridge pointer. So get struct pci_host_bridge pointer
from platform code function mc_platform_init() and make it to be an argument of 
plda_pcie_setup_iomems().


> > Move calling platform_get_drvdata() to mc_platform_init().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Minda Chen <minda.chen@...rfivetech.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > index 9b367927cd32..805870aed61d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/plda/pcie-microchip-host.c
> > @@ -876,11 +876,10 @@ static void plda_pcie_setup_window(void __iomem
> *bridge_base_addr, u32 index,
> >  	writel(0, bridge_base_addr + ATR0_PCIE_WIN0_SRC_ADDR);  }
> >
> > -static int plda_pcie_setup_iomems(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > +static int plda_pcie_setup_iomems(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge,
> >  				  struct plda_pcie_rp *port)
> >  {
> >  	void __iomem *bridge_base_addr = port->bridge_addr;
> > -	struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >  	struct resource_entry *entry;
> >  	u64 pci_addr;
> >  	u32 index = 1;
> > @@ -1018,6 +1017,7 @@ static int mc_platform_init(struct
> > pci_config_window *cfg)  {
> >  	struct device *dev = cfg->parent;
> >  	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> > +	struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >  	void __iomem *bridge_base_addr =
> >  		port->axi_base_addr + MC_PCIE_BRIDGE_ADDR;
> >  	int ret;
> > @@ -1031,7 +1031,7 @@ static int mc_platform_init(struct
> pci_config_window *cfg)
> >  	mc_pcie_enable_msi(port, cfg->win);
> >
> >  	/* Configure non-config space outbound ranges */
> > -	ret = plda_pcie_setup_iomems(pdev, &port->plda);
> > +	ret = plda_pcie_setup_iomems(bridge, &port->plda);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >