linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 3/6] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Document the IPQ9574 PCIe controller.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 09:59:21 +0530
From: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, <kw@...ux.com>, <robh@...nel.org>,
        <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
        <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        <sboyd@...nel.org>, <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/6] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Document the IPQ9574 PCIe
 controller.



On 5/13/2024 12:18 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/05/2024 10:28, devi priya wrote:
> 
>>   
>> +  - if:
>> +      properties:
>> +        compatible:
>> +          contains:
>> +            enum:
>> +              - qcom,pcie-ipq9574
>> +    then:
>> +      properties:
>> +        clocks:
>> +          minItems: 6
>> +          maxItems: 6
>> +        clock-names:
>> +          items:
>> +            - const: ahb  # AHB clock
>> +            - const: aux  # Auxiliary clock
>> +            - const: axi_m # AXI Master clock
>> +            - const: axi_s # AXI Slave clock
>> +            - const: axi_bridge # AXI bridge clock
>> +            - const: rchng
> 
> That's introducing one more order of clocks... Please keep it
> consistent. The only existing case with ahb has it at after axi_m and
> others. Why making things everytime differently?
> 
> I also to propose to finally drop the obvious comments, like "AHB
> clock". It cannot be anything else. AXI Master / slave are descriptive,
> so should stay.
Sure okay, will update this in next spin.

Thanks,
Devi Priya
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>