linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 4/6] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Add PCIe PHYs and controller nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240514073943.GB2463@thinkpad>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 09:39:43 +0200
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: devi priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com,
	robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
	andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
	mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/6] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Add PCIe PHYs and
 controller nodes

On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 01:58:56PM +0530, devi priya wrote:
> Add PCIe0, PCIe1, PCIe2, PCIe3 (and corresponding PHY) devices
> found on IPQ9574 platform. The PCIe0 & PCIe1 are 1-lane Gen3
> host whereas PCIe2 & PCIe3 are 2-lane Gen3 host.
> 
> Signed-off-by: devi priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  Changes in V5:
> 	- Dropped anoc and snoc lane clocks from Phy nodes and enabled them
> 	  via interconnect.
> 	- Dropped msi-parent as it is handled via msi IRQ
> 
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 365 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 361 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
> index 5b3e69379b1f..da6418c9d52b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi

[...]

> +		pcie1: pci@...00000 {

'pcie@' since this is a PCIe controller.

> +			compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq9574";
> +			reg =  <0x10000000 0xf1d>,
> +			       <0x10000F20 0xa8>,

Please use lower case for hex everywhere.

> +			       <0x10001000 0x1000>,
> +			       <0x000F8000 0x4000>,
> +			       <0x10100000 0x1000>;
> +			reg-names = "dbi", "elbi", "atu", "parf", "config";
> +			device_type = "pci";
> +			linux,pci-domain = <2>;
> +			bus-range = <0x00 0xff>;
> +			num-lanes = <1>;
> +			#address-cells = <3>;
> +			#size-cells = <2>;
> +
> +			ranges = <0x01000000 0x0 0x00000000 0x10200000 0x0 0x100000>,  /* I/O */
> +				 <0x02000000 0x0 0x10300000 0x10300000 0x0 0x7d00000>; /* MEM */
> +
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 26 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			interrupt-names = "msi";

Are you sure that this platform only has single MSI SPI IRQ?

> +			#interrupt-cells = <1>;
> +			interrupt-map-mask = <0 0 0 0x7>;
> +			interrupt-map = <0 0 0 1 &intc 0 0 35 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, /* int_a */
> +					<0 0 0 2 &intc 0 0 49 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, /* int_b */
> +					<0 0 0 3 &intc 0 0 84 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, /* int_c */
> +					<0 0 0 4 &intc 0 0 85 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; /* int_d */
> +
> +			/* clocks and clock-names are used to enable the clock in CBCR */

This comment is redundant.

> +			clocks = <&gcc GCC_PCIE1_AHB_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_PCIE1_AUX_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_PCIE1_AXI_M_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_PCIE1_AXI_S_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_PCIE1_AXI_S_BRIDGE_CLK>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_PCIE1_RCHNG_CLK>;
> +			clock-names = "ahb",
> +				      "aux",
> +				      "axi_m",
> +				      "axi_s",
> +				      "axi_bridge",
> +				      "rchng";
> +
> +			resets = <&gcc GCC_PCIE1_PIPE_ARES>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_PCIE1_CORE_STICKY_ARES>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_PCIE1_AXI_S_STICKY_ARES>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_PCIE1_AXI_S_ARES>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_PCIE1_AXI_M_STICKY_ARES>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_PCIE1_AXI_M_ARES>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_PCIE1_AUX_ARES>,
> +				 <&gcc GCC_PCIE1_AHB_ARES>;
> +			reset-names = "pipe",
> +				      "sticky",
> +				      "axi_s_sticky",
> +				      "axi_s",
> +				      "axi_m_sticky",
> +				      "axi_m",
> +				      "aux",
> +				      "ahb";
> +
> +			phys = <&pcie1_phy>;
> +			phy-names = "pciephy";
> +			interconnects = <&gcc MASTER_ANOC_PCIE1 &gcc SLAVE_ANOC_PCIE1>,
> +					<&gcc MASTER_SNOC_PCIE1 &gcc SLAVE_SNOC_PCIE1>;

Is this really the interconnect paths between PCIe-DDR and PCIe-CPU? I doubt...

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்