linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 3/6] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Document the IPQ9574 PCIe controller.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240514072502.GA2463@thinkpad>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 09:25:02 +0200
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: devi priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
	lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, robh@...nel.org,
	krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
	konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/6] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Document the IPQ9574 PCIe
 controller.

On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 08:48:19AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/05/2024 10:28, devi priya wrote:
> 
> >  
> > +  - if:
> > +      properties:
> > +        compatible:
> > +          contains:
> > +            enum:
> > +              - qcom,pcie-ipq9574
> > +    then:
> > +      properties:
> > +        clocks:
> > +          minItems: 6
> > +          maxItems: 6
> > +        clock-names:
> > +          items:
> > +            - const: ahb  # AHB clock
> > +            - const: aux  # Auxiliary clock
> > +            - const: axi_m # AXI Master clock
> > +            - const: axi_s # AXI Slave clock
> > +            - const: axi_bridge # AXI bridge clock
> > +            - const: rchng
> 
> That's introducing one more order of clocks... Please keep it
> consistent. The only existing case with ahb has it at after axi_m and
> others. Why making things everytime differently?
> 
> I also to propose to finally drop the obvious comments, like "AHB
> clock". It cannot be anything else. AXI Master / slave are descriptive,
> so should stay.
> 

+1 to drop the names.

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்