[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8fb9a0ce-0a25-4fbe-9a8f-c2789c1553fa@web.de>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 13:05:26 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-fsi@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Lakshmi Yadlapati <lakshmiy@...ibm.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Ninad Palsule <ninad@...ux.ibm.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [v6 03/20] dt-bindings: fsi: Document the IBM SCOM engine
>>> The SCOM engine provides an interface to the POWER processor PIB
>>> (Pervasive Interconnect Bus).
>>
>> Please improve this change description with a corresponding imperative wording.
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.9#n94
>
> The tense used here is fine.
Is the imperative mood preferred for the final commit message (besides the summary phrase)?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists