linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.8.y 2/2] erofs: reliably distinguish block based and fscache mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 14:01:35 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.8.y 2/2] erofs: reliably distinguish block based and
 fscache mode

On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 02:50:32PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
> 
> commit 7af2ae1b1531feab5d38ec9c8f472dc6cceb4606 upstream.
> 
> When erofs_kill_sb() is called in block dev based mode, s_bdev may not
> have been initialised yet, and if CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ONDEMAND is enabled,
> it will be mistaken for fscache mode, and then attempt to free an anon_dev
> that has never been allocated, triggering the following warning:
> 
> ============================================
> ida_free called for id=0 which is not allocated.
> WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 926 at lib/idr.c:525 ida_free+0x134/0x140
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 14 PID: 926 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.9.0-rc3-dirty #630
> RIP: 0010:ida_free+0x134/0x140
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  erofs_kill_sb+0x81/0x90
>  deactivate_locked_super+0x35/0x80
>  get_tree_bdev+0x136/0x1e0
>  vfs_get_tree+0x2c/0xf0
>  do_new_mount+0x190/0x2f0
>  [...]
> ============================================
> 
> Now when erofs_kill_sb() is called, erofs_sb_info must have been
> initialised, so use sbi->fsid to distinguish between the two modes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240419123611.947084-3-libaokun1@huawei.com
> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  fs/erofs/super.c | 8 ++------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

All now queued up, thanks.

greg k-h