[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202405241625.9FF3B5E@keescook>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 16:26:41 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, slab: don't wrap internal functions with
alloc_hooks()
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 11:50:37AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> The functions __kmalloc_noprof(), kmalloc_large_noprof(),
> kmalloc_trace_noprof() and their _node variants are all internal to the
> implementations of kmalloc_noprof() and kmalloc_node_noprof() and are
> only declared in the "public" slab.h and exported so that those
> implementations can be static inline and distinguish the build-time
> constant size variants. The only other users for some of the internal
> functions are slub_kunit and fortify_kunit tests which make very
> short-lived allocations.
If it's only internal, I'm happy to drop it from fortify_kunit.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists