lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 14:11:05 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Henry Bell <dmoo_dv@...tonmail.com>,
 linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Paul Walmsley
 <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RISC-V: add Star64 board devicetree

>>> Would you like to add an imperative wording for an improved change description?
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.9#n94
…
>> I'm happy to change it, but was going off the format used in Conor's  Milkv Mars commit
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/conor/linux.git/commit/?id=04a228aadb84d894721b13197649ca741f3018bc
>
> Don't worry about Markus, most maintainers (myself included) ignore his
> comments on patches. The commit message here is fine.

Would such a response mean also that you are occasionally ignoring requirements
from a referenced Linux development guideline?

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ